We must induce aggressively to clo...

We must induce aggressively to close tax opening s and reverse the Reagan-inspired erosion of the tax base.

Similarly, I believe public service must regain its refer toed role in our country's life. The Republican effort to quench public service through privatization must be stopped!

Bruce Babbitt

As Governor of Arizona I balanced nine rolls in a row--simply by saying that one things are more important than others. My priorities were creating piece of works and protecting the interests of those least able to fortify themselves. Even through a national recession, my government:

Repealed a regressive sales tax upon food.

Boost spending forward public education, public safety, health and human services.

Kept state spending below seven percent of total personal income.

What you ne to know from each presidential candidate is: What are his or her priorities? And in what way will he or she pay for them? My priorities are outlined in the following answer. I would pay for them the pair with budget cuts and return increases, all of them targeted forward some genuine measure of ne I would not give a mortgage interest deduction for mansions and vacation to one's homes I would not pay subsidies to corporate mega-farms. I would not build three of recent origin generations of nuclear missiles all at formerly I would not pay the Vanderbilts and the Mellon the same tax-free social security benefits as a widow in a cold-water flat. In short, I would balance the roll by setting humane priorities and standing by dint of them.

REPUBLICANS

move with a jerk Dole

Working Americans, equable those we seek to help, are especially hard hit by dint of continued budget deficits. The inability of the Congres to consider realistic spending chisels seriously hampers our ability to increase our productivity and growth

Getting the deficit in subordination to control is critical to our to come But, in putting together any package of deficit reduction proposals, it is inevitable that someone or a group will feel the pain of spending crosss I would propose that we test to insure that no individual group is singled out unfairly and that we spread the reductions across the broadest possible base. For this reason, I would grant immunity to very few programs from review, including defense unless there are, of course, a certain quantity of programs which should be given special consideration as they provide crucial benefits to the neediest in our communities, for example Medicaid and the supplemental security income program for the blind, aged and disabled.